Prime Editing in Neurogenetic Disorders: Molecular Mechanisms, Therapeutic Applications, and Translational Challenges

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.68041/medsc.v1i1/01

Keywords:

CRISPR-Associated Protein 9, Gene Editing, Genetic Therapy, Heredodegenerative Disorders, Nervous System, Nervous System Diseases

Abstract

Genome editing has progressed rapidly, and prime editing is among the most impactful advances since the advent of CRISPR-Cas9. Rather than snipping both strands of DNA and repairing them, prime editors insert a new DNA sequence into the genome via a fused Cas9 nickase and reverse transcriptase, directed to the target sequence by an engineered pegRNA that encodes both the target address and the edit. That combination matters most in tissues where mistakes can't be undone, and few tissues fit that description better than the brain. This editorial briefly discusses the molecular basis of prime editing and then examines its current status for a selection of neurogenetic disorders: Tay-Sachs disease, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, Huntington disease, and Rett syndrome. Preclinical studies have demonstrated prime-editing applications in selected genetic disorders, while evidence for other conditions remains based on related genome-editing approaches, particularly base editing. The translational barriers that currently separate cell-based proof-of-concept from clinical application, including vector packaging constraints, blood-brain barrier penetration, and long-term safety in postmitotic neurons, are also discussed.

Author Biographies

  • Hafsa Aslam, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan

    Center of Excellence in Molecular Biology

  • Fatima Ali, University of Rome , Italy

    School of Molecular Pathology 

References

1. Kosicki M, Tomberg K, Bradley A. Repair of double-strand breaks induced by CRISPR-Cas9 leads to large deletions and complex rearrangements. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36(8):765–771. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4192

2. Anzalone AV, Randolph PB, Davis JR, Sousa AA, Koblan LW, Levy JM, et al. Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA. Nature. 2019;576(7785):149–157. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1711-4

3. Shuto Y, Nakagawa R, Zhu S, Hoki M, Omura SN, Hirano H, et al. Structural basis for pegRNA-guided reverse transcription by a prime editor. Nature. 2024;631(8019):224–231. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07497-8

4. Chen PJ, Hussmann JA, Yan J, Knipping F, Ravisankar P, Chen PF, et al. Enhanced prime editing systems by manipulating cellular determinants of editing outcomes. Cell. 2021;184(22):5635–5652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2021.09.018

5. Park JC, Uhm H, Kim YW, Oh YE, Lee JH, Yang J, et al. AI-generated MLH1 small binder improves prime editing efficiency. Cell. 2025;188(21):5831–5846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2025.07.010

6. Zhao D, Wang T, Zhang L, Sha T, Zhao X, Lu Y, et al. Enhancing prime editing by fusing polymerase substrate-binding proteins to reverse transcriptase. Nucleic Acids Res. 2026;54(12):gkag657. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkag657

7. Anzalone AV, Gao XD, Podracky CJ, Nelson AT, Koblan LW, Raguram A, et al. Programmable deletion, replacement, integration and inversion of large DNA sequences with twin prime editing. Nat Biotechnol. 2022;40(5):731–740. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-021-01133-w

8. Eggenschwiler R, Gschwendtberger T, Felski C, Jahn C, Langer F, Sterneckert J, et al. A selectable all-in-one CRISPR prime editing piggyBac transposon allows for highly efficient gene editing in human cell lines. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):22154. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01689-2

9. Wang Q, Capelletti S, Liu J, Janssen JM, Gonçalves MA. Selection-free precise gene repair using high-capacity adenovector delivery of advanced prime editing systems rescues dystrophin synthesis in DMD muscle cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024;52(5):2740–2757. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkae057

10. Matuszek Z, Arbab M, Kesavan M, Hsu A, Roy JC, Zhao J, et al. Base editing of trinucleotide repeats that cause Huntington's disease and Friedreich's ataxia reduces somatic repeat expansions in patient cells and in mice. Nat Genet. 2025;57(6):1437–1451. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-025-02172-8

11. Gao Z, Ravendran S, Mikkelsen NS, Haldrup J, Cai H, Ding X, et al. A truncated reverse transcriptase enhances prime editing by split AAV vectors. Mol Ther. 2022;30(9):2942–2951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2022.07.001

12. Drouyer M, Merjane J, Nazareth D, Knight M, Scott S, Liao SH, et al. Development of CNS tropic AAV1-like variants with reduced liver-targeting following systemic administration in mice. Mol Ther. 2024;32(3):818–836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2024.01.024

13. Nijhuis PJ, Romijn M, Honing R, van Zon G, Huitinga I, de Winter F, et al. Developing a minimally invasive gene therapy for multiple sclerosis. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. 2025;33(3):101504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omtm.2025.101504

14. Shay TF, Sullivan EE, Ding X, Chen X, Ravindra Kumar S, Goertsen D, et al. Primate-conserved carbonic anhydrase IV and murine-restricted LY6C1 enable blood-brain barrier crossing by engineered viral vectors. Sci Adv. 2023;9(16):eadg6618. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adg6618

15. Kanno S, Sato K, Nakazawa T. Precise generation of human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cell lines harboring disease-relevant single nucleotide variants using a prime editing system. Bio Protoc. 2025;15(4):e5191. https://doi.org/10.21769/BioProtoc.5191

16. Petrova IO, Smirnikhina SA. The development, optimization and future of prime editing. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(23):17045. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242317045

Downloads

Published

2026-11-01

Issue

Section

PUBLICATIONS

How to Cite

Prime Editing in Neurogenetic Disorders: Molecular Mechanisms, Therapeutic Applications, and Translational Challenges. (2026). MSAR Medical Sciences, 1(1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.68041/medsc.v1i1/01